HAGA CLIC AQUÍ PARA VER ESTE ARTÍCULO EN ESPAÑOL

Philip J. Siegel, Esq., is a partner and shareholder with the firm of Hendrick, Phillips, Salzman & Siegel. Philip attended the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan graduating with distinction from the School of Business Administration where he earned his B.B.A. Mr. Siegel received his law degree from Emory University School of Law. He worked in the public accounting industry as a state and local tax consultant for two years prior to commencing his career as a construction litigation and labor/employment attorney. Mr. Siegel’s practice focuses primarily in the areas of labor/employment law, including defense of OSHA citations, immigration compliance assistance, Davis-Bacon Act consulting, contract consulting, and construction litigation, including representation of general contractors, subcontractors and suppliers, all on a national basis. 

Mr. Siegel presented the sessions - My Employees are Legal! An Overview of the Form I-9 Process from Hiring Through ICE Audit; and Getting Paid - Strategies for Roofing Contractors to Protect the Right to Payment at the Western Roofing Expo 2025.  

LEGAL NEWS & UPDATES: 

Beware of the ICE Investigator

By: Philip J. Siegel, Esq.,

President Trump has made it clear that immigration enforcement and deportation actions will increase under his presidency. Indeed, there has been a noticeable uptick in activity by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). That level of activity is expected to remain consistent, with the possibility of an increase in worksite visits from ICE, particularly in the construction industry. Notably, it is anticipated that the Trump Administration will increase Form I-9 audits to 12,000 a year (by comparison, the Biden Administration averaged less than 500 Form I-9 audits a year).

Employers in the construction industry need to be prepared if ICE arrives at a worksite. If the purpose of the ICE visit it to announce its intention to conduct a Form I-9 audit, the employer will have three days to produce the Forms for audit. In order to avoid a fire drill attempting to organize the company’s Forms and make necessary corrections before the Forms must be produced, construction industry employers would be wise to conduct their own self-audit without waiting for ICE to arrive. It is much easier to make necessary corrections without the pressure of having to do it company-wide over a three day period. But what if the purpose of ICE’s visit is to meet and interview your employees to determine whether your employees are legally in the United States? Are you required to allow ICE access to your employees?

Employers are not required to allow ICE access to non-public areas of the worksite, unless the ICE agents have a search warrant signed by a federal judge allowing them access. This holds true even if the ICE agents have an administrative warrant from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for the arrest of an employee (employers are not required to provide ICE access to non-public areas in response to an administrative subpoena from DHS). Construction employers can require the agents to obtain a search warrant signed by a federal judge as a condition to access non-public areas of the worksite. Construction employers will not, however, be able to deny the ICE agents access to public areas of a worksite.

If the ICE agents do have a search warrant, access must be granted. In those instances, legal counsel should be contacted immediately. The employer should make a copy of the search warrant. The ICE agent should be accompanied by the employer during the search, and the employer should object if the scope of the search exceeds what is permitted by the warrant.

During the search, the employer is under no obligation to answer any questions. Similarly, employees also have the right to remain silent (although, the employer should not instruct the employee not to answer ICE’s questions or to flee the worksite). It is ok for the employer to tell its employees it is up to them whether to speak with the ICE agents. In response to an administrative warrant seeking an employee, it is important that employers know they are under no legal obligation to bring the employee to the ICE agents. Indeed, the employer is under no legal obligation to let ICE know whether the employee is even working that day.

It is important that all employers in the construction industry prepare for a Form I-9 audit and the possibility of ICE showing up at one of its worksites, with or without a search warrant. If you would like assistance in conducting your own Form I-9 audit, or if you have any questions about the company’s rights and the rights of its employees in the event of a worksite raid, please contact Philip Siegel. You can e-mail Philip at pjs@hpsslaw.com, or you can call him directly at (404) 469-9197.

LEGAL  DISCLAIMER

All rights reserved.  All content (text, trademarks, illustrations, reports, photos, logos, graphics, files, designs, arrangements, etc.) in this Technical Opinion (“Opinion”) is the intellectual property of Western States Roofing Contractors Association (WSRCA) and is protected by the applicable protective laws governing intellectual property. The Opinion is intended for the exclusive use by its members as a feature of their membership. This document is intended to be used for educational purposes only, and no one should act or rely solely on any information contained in this Opinion as it is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney or construction engineer with specific project knowledge. Neither WSRCA nor any of its, contractors, subcontractors, or any of their employees, directors, officers, agents, or assigns make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use (or the results of such use) of any information or process disclosed in the Opinion.  Reference herein to any general or specific commercial product, process or service does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement or recommendation by WSRCA. References are provided as citations and aids to help identify and locate other resources that may be of interest, and are not intended to state or imply that WSRCA sponsors, is affiliated or associated with, or is legally responsible for the content reflected in those resources. WSRCA has no control over those resources and the inclusion of any references does not necessarily imply the recommendation or endorsement of same.